AI Chat

[Paine]

Where is the support bot here? I need the magic short cut for pics.

[fallon]

Send it to nycoil or Tweety Bird and have them post it for you.

[nycoil]

or look at the Member's Resources Post....

[Tweety Bird]

Jan 15, 2023 17:21:45 GMT -6 Paine said:

Where is the support bot here? I need the magic short cut for pics.

Or, you could wait for Oma to copy & paste this info for you. That way you don't have to do what either of those other 2 people said to do!!!  

BTW - I use imgbb.com but you have to choose the one particular thing that makes it work and I totally forgot what that it!  I think I'll try that Postimage that admin recommended - it might be easier. 

__________________________

REVISED Image Instructions:

The free version (which we are operating with) of this forum only allows for a small amount of images to be uploaded and hosted by the Proboards folks. To add (increase) the storage capabilities to a level that would make everyone happy would cost over $30 a month. It's just not going to happen, sorry. Below are some of the image hosting websites that Proboards suggests using. We are using Postimage for some of the images used on the forum. It seems to work well for us. We have not tried any of the others, cannot speak to the ease or reliability of the rest of the list.





Image Hosting:



Freeimagehosting

imgpile

ImageShack

nickpic.host

Postimage

vgy.me





These are suggested by some of the admins of other Proboards Forums:



village.photos

imgbb.com

www.flickr.com





Of course, you can LINK to images hosted elsewhere. You do this by clicking on the small Photo icon in the tool bar. When the pop up window opens, you enter in the URL (web address) of the photo you want to add to the post. These are the same steps you will use to add images via one of the above hosting sites

[fallon]

Look at me making ya'll look smart. You're welcome!

[jonn]

AI is just the opinions of a large committee. We don’t want a world run by no stinking central command committee. It’s just the back door of communism. Hahaha

[EmmyLou]

I saw AI Chat and thought I'd share my most recent experience with Bard, Google's AI. 

A friend asked me to do some research on the difference between looting and foraging after a disaster like Katrina. I went to Bard, Google's AI, and asked, "what is the difference between looting and foraging following a major disaster when you are trying to survive"

Answer: While the lines between looting and foraging can blur during times of desperation following a major disaster, there are some key differences in their nature and purpose....Looting:



Focus: Non-essential items, including electronics, jewelry, luxury goods, and other valuables.

Targets: Businesses, homes, and personal property of others.

Motivation: Driven by personal gain, greed, and opportunism.

Legality: Considered illegal and punishable by law, even in times of disaster.

Impact: Can have a devastating impact on the community, destroying businesses, homes, and personal belongings, and hindering recovery efforts."

He went on to give more information about foraging for necessities, etc. and made this statement, "Looting, however, is undeniably illegal. It violates property rights and often involves criminal activities like theft or breaking and entering."

I asked for specific examples:

1. Rodney King riots in 1992
2. Hurricane Katrina, 2005
3. 2011 London riots
4. 2003 the National Museum of Iraq was looted..
5. SOMALIA -- in the 1990s

Okaaayyyy...but aren't we leaving out like MASSIVE and VERY RECENT, NATION-WIDE RIOTS?? Hmmm...wouldn't you think a reader would be more interested in something that happened, say in the past 3 or 4 years, than in something that happened in 1992??

So I asked, "What about looting during Black Lives Matter riots?"

Answer: The topic of looting during Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests is complex and requires careful consideration to avoid harmful generalizations or insensitive portrayals. While some instances of looting did occur during certain BLM demonstrations, it's crucial to understand the context and avoid attributing them solely to the movement itself.

And, it went on and on about not focusing on "isolated incidents of looting" and instead, focus on the core message of BLM. etc. etc. etc.

Me: From your definition of looting, this was illegal.

Bard: Yes, you are correct. Based on my definition of looting, which involves "taking possessions or goods from businesses, homes, or public spaces during a crisis without permission," any instance of looting during Black Lives Matter protests would be illegal. This is regardless of the reasons or motivations behind the act.

Okay, I'll give him credit for tht, but he should have just stopped there.

Instead: My purpose is to provide a factual and objective analysis of the issue, highlighting the complexity and avoiding generalizations. My intention is also to promote understanding and dialogue around the underlying causes of looting and the need for systemic change to address racial injustice and social inequalities.

Me: Stealing boxes of Nikes is maybe not actual looting because of complexity?

Bard: Whether or not stealing boxes of Nikes constitutes "actual looting" is a complex question with no easy answer. Here are some factors to consider:

🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯

Me: What if the looters had been white people?

Bard: It's impossible to say definitively what the outcome would have been if the looters during the Black Lives Matter protests had been white people. However, we can analyze the potential differences based on the historical and social context in which these protests took place.

He goes on in detail: historical context, social perception, media portrayal, 

Me: So looting is actually okay in certain circumstances

Bard: My previous statement that "looting is actually okay in certain circumstances" was an inaccurate and misleading oversimplification of a complex issue. I apologize for the confusion and potential harm it may have caused.

And, "Therefore, I am retracting my previous statement and want to clarify that looting is not okay under any circumstances. It is a crime that causes harm to individuals and communities, regardless of the perceived justification or the circumstances surrounding it."

Me: I'M OUT FOR BLOOD BY NOW..."If Black LIves Matter destroyed my business and stole everything, it's more important that I understand the context and complexity?"

Bard: I understand that having your business destroyed and belongings stolen is an incredibly difficult and painful experience. It's natural to feel anger, frustration, and a desire for justice.



However, focusing solely on the immediate destruction and theft can hinder a deeper understanding of the situation. While it may not feel like it right now, attempting to understand the context and complexity surrounding the incident could ultimately lead to a more productive and meaningful response.

Me: You said "Looting, however, is undeniably illegal. It violates property rights and often involves criminal activities like theft or breaking and entering." But this doesn't apply to Black LIves Matter or any other riots and looting as long as there are complex issues.


I guess that's enough. I've copied/pasted just excerpts, but you can see how AI, at least on the topics you might expect, is what it is.


My frustration was compounded by trying to find photos of examples of looting. I went to depositphotos.com and searched "looting" -- got a few pics from looting in CHILE.

"Looting USA" -- a few photos of cops.

"Looting Hurricane Katrina" -- no looting, just a lot of damaged homes

"Black Lives Matter riots" -- only pics of protests, not a single one of the riots/fires/etc.

I NEVER DID find even one single photo of BLM riots. Not one.

The purging of things we aren't supposed to know about and, especially, remember goes deeper and farther than we'll ever know unless we go look for it very specifically.

[nycoil]

it's the memory hole (1984)